3 ms·
Here's what his second link landed on, for me: https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/j.1552-4604.2002.tb06002.x https://accp1.onlinelibra
by pmarreck 5y ago
Here's what his second link landed on, for me:
https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/j.1552-4604.2002.tb06002.x https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/...
- junon 5y agoThanks. I don't think that person actually read the study, they just wanted to slap some things onto their bias to prove their point - as I said. That study tested the effects of withdrawal within long-term users, and the cognitive impairment resulting from that, over 28 days of abstinence. From the conclusion: > It is unclear whether these deficits might be attributable to a residue of cannabinoids in the central nervous system or to withdrawal effects from abruptly stopping cannabis, although both factors likely contribute. In any event, our data suggest that these deficits are largely or completely reversible after 28 days of abstinence. So, this study found no evidence long-term permanent cognitive impairment, which does nothing to prove the point the person who posted it was trying to make.