> I mean, true in a technical sense, but don't all the sample functions here have known analytical Fourier transforms? Yes but currently I make not use of it b

> I mean, true in a technical sense, but don't all the sample functions here have known analytical Fourier transforms? Yes but currently I make not use of it but simply apply the DFT on the samples of the function. Making use of the analytical versions would result in smoother results but I would like to allow for custom signal functions in the future so I would like to keep the simple approach of just doing the DFT. > It would also be cool to have functions in the shape dropdown that are not symmetrical. Nice idea but what interesting functins would be there that are not achieved by using the time shift? > Sure, introducing a time shift did the trick, but it was a tiny disappointment. I agree