3 ms·
> being able to prove ownership I’m skeptical that this holds in a legal sense. Something that may be effectively the same as ownership of something, maybe. M
by drdeca 5y ago
> being able to prove ownership
I’m skeptical that this holds in a legal sense.
Something that may be effectively the same as ownership of something, maybe. Makes sense that a license to do something could be granted which requires the licensee to possess some thing. (E.g. perhaps I could grant someone the license to use a video clip, but only under the condition that they own any red pen while publishing any derivative works?)
But I’m skeptical that possessing a token can strictly speaking confer legal ownership of a copyright.
- vmception 5y agoThis is about address signing to prove ownership of the NFT on the spot to get access to a physical members only club for example Just signing public private key cryptography Except the clubs are funded by royalties as the nfts are traded for different prices and the address corresponds to the current owner list Thats happening right now The other conversation about copyright or usage licenses is interesting and Id have that discussion elsewhere. We are just talking about proving the possession form of ownership right now