4 ms·
You're absolutely right. I had not noticed. I'd say this was to do with GuardDuty isn't free but has consistently been such a small line item on my AWS bills th
by LilBytes 5y ago
You're absolutely right. I had not noticed. I'd say this was to do with GuardDuty isn't free but has consistently been such a small line item on my AWS bills that I thought it was free.
Thank you for the correction.
All the same the point I was trying to drive is when the service is incredibly effective, both in practice and cost, it should in nearly all instances be implemented.
Edit: I wanted to amend my statement but the window to make those changes has passed.
- lars_francke 5y agoThanks. This seems like a service that _should_ be free and enabled by default at least with a subset of options for the root account.