4 ms·
As a consumer you should ask yourself: do the ads provide any benefit to me? And if there is none, you should just block the them. Sure it's nothing new that c
by fileeditview 5y ago
As a consumer you should ask yourself: do the ads provide any benefit to me? And if there is none, you should just block the them.
Sure it's nothing new that companies try to show you ads. But in the same spirit I always turned down volume or switched channel on TV when ads were on. This was in the past. These days I don't even bother watching channels with ads.
I personally would not be sad if the whole ad industry became less significant and we had more paid services. They also tend to be longer-lasting than many ad-sponsored services. Also I am the customer and can demand certain things, whereas with a free service I can demand nothing and I am not the customer.
As a student I made a few small Android games with ads. They brought in a few hundred bucks. Then I was blocked by Admob for whatever reason. At this point I learned what a crooked business this is and I swore that I will never make an ad-sponsored app again. If I have an idea for a product/service that will only work in that setting it will not even go on my list.
- tinus_hn 5y agoThere’s no free lunch, the ads provide you with the ability to see things on the internet for free.
- marcodiego 5y agoI think FLOSS people ought to disagree with you. Also, this very site has no ads. Neither does wikipedia. Nor librivox, or Project Gutemberg...
- tinus_hn 5y agoMany of these projects are funded by sponsors that couldn’t exist without internet ads.
- pseudalopex 5y agoHN has ads for YC companies.
- fileeditview 5y agoAs I said.. I would prefer to pay for valuable content. Then the rest splits into two categories. Truly free (maybe with donations, or totally free) and a load of crap content I don't need to see anyways.