5 ms·

Couple of features I wish ST2 had: 1) Ability to rename files and tell that to git/any revision control while it does it. 2) Bundler integration to automatica

Couple of features I wish ST2 had: 1) Ability to rename files and tell that to git/any revision control while it does it. 2) Bundler integration to automatically add all bundles to the project so they can be searched on.

jjm 15y ago
If you do #1, you might as well throw in more commands. I can see why the author might not want to cascade in to that just yet.
kellishaver 15y ago
I wish it had code folding, and I wish I could do a block cursor instead of the | (easier to see) but I don't think those are hugely popular requests.
- Groxx 15y ago
  Last I've seen, code folding has been requested from day 1. And I see requests / lamentations / mentions of it every time discussions about it crop up, without exception. Personally, as shiny as the scroll-preview is, the fact that it doesn't show the structure of the entire document makes it almost worthless to me. As much as I hate visual studio, MetalScroll[1] was fantastic. You can see functions by shape, visually navigate the entire file at a glance (though I have good visual memory, so that may be easier for me), and it shows folds, breakpoints, changed lines, and selections. ST2 shows... about a screen in either direction. [1] http://code.google.com/p/metalscroll/ http://code.google.com/p/metalscroll/
  - chrisrogers 15y ago
    I would like to second this sentiment. That feature has become a vital part of how I navigate code, especially for projects that I am looking at for the first time. It's the only thing preventing me from using SublimeText 2.
    - Androsynth 15y ago
      SublimeText's minimap is not as feature rich as metal scroll, but its pretty useful in general as a nav tool. I often find myself wishing Chrome had a scrollable minimap.
- T-R 15y ago
  The userecho page on Code Folding has a lot of votes, though there's some speculation that it'd be pretty difficult to do with the current implementation of the editor control. http://sublimetext.userecho.com/topic/19281-syntax-code-folding/ http://sublimetext.userecho.com/topic/19281-syntax-code-fold...

jjm 15y ago

If you do #1, you might as well throw in more commands. I can see why the author might not want to cascade in to that just yet.

kellishaver 15y ago

I wish it had code folding, and I wish I could do a block cursor instead of the | (easier to see) but I don't think those are hugely popular requests.

Groxx 15y ago
Last I've seen, code folding has been requested from day 1. And I see requests / lamentations / mentions of it every time discussions about it crop up, without exception. Personally, as shiny as the scroll-preview is, the fact that it doesn't show the structure of the entire document makes it almost worthless to me. As much as I hate visual studio, MetalScroll[1] was fantastic. You can see functions by shape, visually navigate the entire file at a glance (though I have good visual memory, so that may be easier for me), and it shows folds, breakpoints, changed lines, and selections. ST2 shows... about a screen in either direction. [1] http://code.google.com/p/metalscroll/ http://code.google.com/p/metalscroll/
- chrisrogers 15y ago
  I would like to second this sentiment. That feature has become a vital part of how I navigate code, especially for projects that I am looking at for the first time. It's the only thing preventing me from using SublimeText 2.
  - Androsynth 15y ago
    SublimeText's minimap is not as feature rich as metal scroll, but its pretty useful in general as a nav tool. I often find myself wishing Chrome had a scrollable minimap.
T-R 15y ago
The userecho page on Code Folding has a lot of votes, though there's some speculation that it'd be pretty difficult to do with the current implementation of the editor control. http://sublimetext.userecho.com/topic/19281-syntax-code-folding/ http://sublimetext.userecho.com/topic/19281-syntax-code-fold...