4 ms·
Yeah, it's not like I don't get their angle. It's valid, drove a lot of engagement with their content, and I can respect the commitment to the bit. But at the
by dogleash 5y ago
Yeah, it's not like I don't get their angle. It's valid, drove a lot of engagement with their content, and I can respect the commitment to the bit. But at the same time I just see a single point belabored over and over again instead of really digging into anything really interesting.
I can't predict how their series will continue, but I think they've missed a massive opportunity to use the same premise and display just a little bit more self-awareness about how people experience different levels of software skill (or graduated steps of competence in any endeavor, really).
I thought for a few seconds that such a change could only help the content, but after snapping out of it I realized: no, that would only give it appeal to me. Of course it would hurt the content overall. This content is bait for people who want to laugh/facepalm at linux masochists and people who want to laugh/faceplam at a noob struggling.
- V__ 5y ago> just a little bit more self-awareness about how people experience different levels of software skill (or graduated steps of competence in any endeavor, really). They show more of this in the WAN show discussions, but I think you are right that a lot of people would find such a conversation boring. So, I can't really blame them for seperating this into the show format.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]