3 ms·
chrisco255's post was a textbook gish gallop. I would not blame anyone here for not bothering to do an item-by-item refutation.
by magila 5y ago
chrisco255's post was a textbook gish gallop. I would not blame anyone here for not bothering to do an item-by-item refutation.
- chrisco255 5y agoOh poppycock, it was not gish gallop. It is a list of in-production applications that you should research and understand before you do some drive by criticism of a rapidly evolving and growing technological ecosystem. If you lack basic curiosity, there's not much anyone can do to convince you. Anyone can be an arm-chair critic, go find the fundamental flaws in these in-production systems and tell me why they're not sustainable. Tell me why they're not the future. Be specific.
- magila 5y agoA project's mere existence say nothing about how useful it is. Your argument would be a lot more convincing if you just picked one or two projects and showed evidence of their widespread use as something other than a speculative instrument.