5 ms·
How is "purported interoperability" important here though? There were big news warning of highly proprietary cheap Apple chargers frying MacBooks as well. You'r
by izacus 5y ago
How is "purported interoperability" important here though? There were big news warning of highly proprietary cheap Apple chargers frying MacBooks as well. You're trying to blame USB-C for a problem that's completely orthogonal to it.
- theshrike79 5y agoHow is a user supposed to know which USB-C port is kosher for which USB-C cable? The connectors are exactly the same.
- mox1 5y agoif you buy a quality charger, that actually follow the usb-c specs, you don’t need to know. When Lenovo wants $50 for a charger and you grab a $15 one off Amazon, don’t be overly surprised when it doesn’t follow the specs and cuts corners.
- hedora 5y agoI’m sure you can find someone willing to charge you $50 on Amazon for an equally-bad charger. Again, without some sort of standards enforcement, how can the end-purchaser differentiate between a quality cable and garbage.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- NikolaNovak 5y agoI feel we are still talking orthogonally. Connectors are the same, so what? A cheap and poor micro usb, or apple magsafe, or household 110v or whatever cable, can fry your stuff. Regardless of connector or standard or shape or size you can buy a quality product or a crap product. Usb c is not a sign of quality. It's a standard. I think to siblings point, you can buy an apple fake charger that can fry your Macbook. That's not apples fault or standard fault or universal design fault. That's a crappy no name cheap part fault. Don't get me wrong. I used to buy 50cent Dollarama cables too. Then I followed some of the links fellow hacker news folks posted and now I don't - whether usb c or whatever else. Seeing an oscilloscope or whatever graph of quality vs shoddy charger is illuminating and terrifying.