Also, I want to clearly and strongly reject non-law enforced "change in behavior" as being any defense of government removals of freedom. It does not defend s

Also, I want to clearly and strongly reject non-law enforced "change in behavior" as being any defense of government removals of freedom. It does not defend such attacks in ANY way whatsoever. While in my other reply I express my doubt at "change in behavior" being the driver of any sort of economic impact similarities, say it was. In that case, what it would show is that overbearing government removals of freedoms to the extent that you can't even go out in public are not even needed to have that effect in behavior.