4 ms·
The Magma name appears to require disambiguation: His Magma programming language (https://github.com/blainehansen/magma https://github.com/blainehansen/magma):
by kjhughes 5y ago
The Magma name appears to require disambiguation:
His Magma programming language (https://github.com/blainehansen/magma https://github.com/blainehansen/magma):
The goal of this project is to: create a programming language and surrounding education/tooling ecosystem capable of making formal verification and provably correct software mainstream and normal among working software engineers.
Magma computer algebra system (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(computer_algebra_system) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(computer_algebra_system...):
Magma is a computer algebra system designed to solve problems in algebra, number theory, geometry and combinatorics. It is named after the algebraic structure magma. It runs on Unix-like operating systems, as well as Windows.
- jdougan 5y agoMy first thought was the Magma object database https://github.com/magma-database/magma https://github.com/magma-database/magma
- trylfthsk 5y agoAnd here I was hoping someone was deep diving the prog rock rabbit-hole: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(band) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(band)
- CJefferson 5y agoI was just about to post the same thing. I don't like picking on things like names, but the "old magma" is still very popular in mathematics.
- joppy 5y agoI heard from a friend (have not verified myself) that the paper in which the Magma computer algebra system was introduced is the most-cited paper in the whole of pure mathematics.
- williamstein 5y agoThere is a discussion about how to define this and a comment concluding that indeed by one metric the Magma paper is most cited here: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/199978/the-most-cited-paper-in-mathematics https://mathoverflow.net/questions/199978/the-most-cited-pap... John Cannon, who started Magma, pushed very hard for people to cite that paper whenever they used Magma in a paper. We eventually did something similar with SageMath for a bit, but it felt weird having everybody cite a paper with me personally as the main author, when there are nearly 1000 contributors to Sage, so we made up a reference with the author “The Sage Developers”, or something like that. As a result there is probably no MathSciNet entry tracking citations to Sagemath even though many papers cite Sagemath.