> He ran after Rittenhouse to attack him instead of fleeing. And yet when Rittenhouse turns and shoots Rosenbaum instead of continuing to flee, that's self-def

> He ran after Rittenhouse to attack him instead of fleeing. And yet when Rittenhouse turns and shoots Rosenbaum instead of continuing to flee, that's self-defence? > We are not debating Rittenhouse self-defense [...] You are derailing the conversation and I do not want to repeat myself or extend my time on this. No, we were debating Facebook's response. I said that I thought it was reasonable for Facebook to act with an abundance of caution around the killing of two unarmed men. Someone objected to me calling him 'unarmed'. My contention is that although a skateboard can be used as a weapon, that wasn't how Huber used his skateboard. I'm not sure what I'm 'derailing', or what you think 'the conversation' is, but you're welcome to stop commenting if you don't want to debate further.