> When it comes to censorship, I think at best it doesn't really matter why Your "censorship" framing is just a speculative assumption. There is no proof that

> When it comes to censorship, I think at best it doesn't really matter why Your "censorship" framing is just a speculative assumption. There is no proof that censorship is going on here. > What hypothetical "pure" intentions would you suggest are possibilities? There are billions of comments on YouTube and anyone who actually works in software understands that software very often does things that the programmers didn't intend, and I'm not even talking about ML which is literally statistically applied logic, i.e. the wrong thing happening is inevitably assured and assumed from the start. This whole argument is moot anyway, there's no commercial incentive to hire a legion of moderators because for all that extra money spent they'd simply be accused of bias even if the moderation was actually fair, a statistic of which there is literally no trusted party to arbiter.