3 ms·
You seem to be letting your emotions rule and not following the thread you started. Your point was: vaccines don’t prevent infections. Even if vaccines were hy
by yibg 5y ago
You seem to be letting your emotions rule and not following the thread you started.
Your point was: vaccines don’t prevent infections. Even if vaccines were hypothetically 100% effective at preventing infections then there is still no point in putting restrictions on the unvaccinated since those vaccinated would be perfectly protected.
My question was, given the above what about people that can’t get the vaccine for various reasons? We’ll have “walking bio weapons” that are dangerous to them.
Basically how far does individual freedom extend with you? Does it go so far as putting other people at risk?
- mandmandam 5y agoI suggest you try reading the thread again after getting some oxygen or something. All the answers are there.