4 ms·
I honestly tried to read this page, but I just cannot get past the schizophrenic formatting. It seems like every one of the brand names involved is a combinati
by jffry 5y ago
I honestly tried to read this page, but I just cannot get past the schizophrenic formatting. It seems like every one of the brand names involved is a combination of bold, italic, and normal text. Some of the parenthetical comments are a light gray color that is hard to read while others are not. Acronyms like HTML/CSS/JS are outlined in light blue for some reason. The comparison after the first videos has randomly smaller font size. Every usage of the common verb "sync" is bold and accompanied a service-mark superscript ("sync℠")
edit: In the spirit of trying to not just complain: an HTML playground with bidirectional sync of code state <> dom state is pretty cool! I look forward to seeing the open-source core :)
- cetinsert 5y agoThank you for informing us of the annoyances you have encountered. We are simply not well-trained in public communication. In fact, I wrote this post as the main dev myself. Todo: refrain from using excessive formatting and strive for better consistency.
- whiddershins 5y agoA decent guideline is aim for a maximum of three font treatments per view, and see how far you can get with just that.
- jffry 5y agoThanks for taking my complaints in the spirit in which they were intended. The bidirectional sync is really cool and I can understand being excited to share. I'm looking forwards to seeing the open source core
- cetinsert 5y agoYou are most welcome! A huge step in the direction of releasing this as its own independent open service would be finding a good name/domain and we are 1000% open for suggestions.
- andybak 5y agoCan you just drop the whole "Sync℠" thing and use normal english letters for the name? I hate it.
- cetinsert 5y agoReduced to 1 instance because of the original comment.