3 ms·
At least we are on the same page on the level of sandboxing provided. For the record, it was your comment that called it a "big mistake" to not have finer-grain
by titzer 5y ago
At least we are on the same page on the level of sandboxing provided. For the record, it was your comment that called it a "big mistake" to not have finer-grained memory protection. I explained why we did that. And now you're saying someone "oversold" it as magic pixie dust? I'm not sure which hype train you're referring to, TBH. It wasn't core members or the CG, as we understood very clearly which security properties we were gaining and which we were not gaining.