3 ms·
Why would you assume it's unlikely to harm you without years long studies that were the normal expectation before the last year and a half?
by mk81 5y ago
Why would you assume it's unlikely to harm you without years long studies that were the normal expectation before the last year and a half?
- lillecarl 5y agoBecause mRNA vaccines doesn't contain the dangerous virus at all, "just some genetic information" which will trigger your immune system to build antibodies. Things move forward, TTM for software features these days are often shorter because of technical advances, why wouldn't the same be true in biotech?
- snovv_crash 5y agoIt's about the number of patients, not the time. It's cheaper to run a trial over a longer period of time, a few patients at a time, but they don't continue to track patients for the entire duration. In this case tons of money was thrown at it and they were able to run tons of patients in parallel. Billions of doses of the vaccine have been given - seriously, what more do you want?
- mk81 5y agoWhatever amount of time was in the regulations before everything was thrown out the window in the past year and a half.