3 ms·
Aren’t infected people required to quarantine for a period of time? “Preventing both relatively larger and smaller harms, because they are both too large to tol
by thewakalix 5y ago
Aren’t infected people required to quarantine for a period of time? “Preventing both relatively larger and smaller harms, because they are both too large to tolerate,” doesn’t seem contradictory to me. And “not being vaccinated” is a pretty concrete property.
- TheSpiceIsLife 5y ago> Aren’t infected people required to quarantine for a period of time? No? Only some subset of those who are infected are required to isolate / quarantine. Those who don’t get tested are free to meander.
- bostik 5y ago> Those who don’t get tested are free to meander. And we should call them for what they are: mobile biohazards. There are established protocols and procedures for dealing with such.
- TheSpiceIsLife 5y agoAll humans are disease vectors. I’m not convinced we, here in Australia anyway, have achieved a balance sufficient to satisfy my particular set of beliefs - as far as they go in this five minute period.
- account42 5y ago> Those who don’t get tested are free to meander. Since worklplaces and public transport require at tests for the unvaccinated now, those walking around untested are mostly the vaccinated.