3 ms·
Apple apparently got a patent for direct retinal lighting, which is probably a better experience overall, and seems more flexible. So it might be a totally diff
by LadyCailin 5y ago
Apple apparently got a patent for direct retinal lighting, which is probably a better experience overall, and seems more flexible. So it might be a totally different experience.
- thebigman433 5y agoProjecting the image to the retina directly actually isnt really a better experience. It means you get an extremely small eyebox, and the glasses would require a custom fit for every single user. You can look at Intel Vaunt/North Focals for what this experience is like. If you even move your eyes too far to the side, the image will disappear.
- dev_tty01 5y agoAs built so far, it is a small eyebox. Don't judge the future on one unreleased product. With more emitters plus computation and sensing, you could compensate for eye movement. Seems a bit short-sighted to make a blanket dismissal of an approach that has not been fully developed.