4 ms·
i think the complaint is not giving status reports, but being forced to listen to others’ seemingly irrelevant status reports.
by wallacoloo 5y ago
i think the complaint is not giving status reports, but being forced to listen to others’ seemingly irrelevant status reports.
- wpietri 5y agoExactly. As well as more efficient ways of keeping people updated. Think of all the people who have to enter a ton of stuff in to Jira and then give the boss a verbal status report. And let's not forget obviating the need for status reports entirely. I've been part of teams that got solid work done without ever having to give status reports to anybody. We'd ship early and often; our "report" was frequent results.
- newsclues 5y agoBig meetings are more time effective and easy for a manager but worse for many workers and productivity.
- amcoastal 5y agoThis has been a huge advantage of the WFH culture lately. I can just keep working while I listen to other people update the manager.
- odshoifsdhfs 5y agoWhy do this? Use that time to read or browse HN or something. Lets say one hour meetings per day. This means 8-1 = 7 hours of real work. If you work the 8 hours + the meeting, if you ever have to go back to the office, either you will have to work 9 hours to produce the same as WFH (since now you have to sit on the meeting), or drop in productivity and get scolded by a manager (you are producing 12.5% less)