5 ms·
$100/TB/month is significantly more expensive than the standard object storage options. Backblaze is $5/TB/month, for example. For personal file backup, you on
by vlmutolo 5y ago
$100/TB/month is significantly more expensive than the standard object storage options. Backblaze is $5/TB/month, for example.
For personal file backup, you only need a fairly reliable object storage system. And Backblaze seems to be the cheapest.
- tzs 5y agoIf you consider storage in isolation, Backblaze does seem to be the best deal. However, there may be bundles that include storage that are a better deal if you need the other things in the bundle. For example if you have sufficient need for Microsoft Office programs to justify a Microsoft 365 subscription, that comes with 1 TB of OneDrive on the Personal subscription ($6.99/month, $69.99/year). Most backup programs seem to know how to work with OneDrive directly or know how to use rclone which knows how to work with OneDrive [1]. If you need more than 1 TB, OneDrive becomes less attractive. It seems you can add another 1 TB for $9.99/month, but unless you have to all your storage be in one place, it would be cheaper to get your second TB at Backblaze. (And if you need 2 TB in one one place, buying 2 TB at Backblaze + An MS 365 Personal subscription would be the same price as an MS 365 Personal + 1 TB Extra OneDrive, and the former gives you your 2 TB in one place at BB and 1 TB at OneDrive). The Family subscription ($9.99/month or $99.99/year) includes 6 TB of OneDrive, but it is partitioned into 6 separate 1 TB shares for 6 people on the account. A person is identified by an email address, so there is nothing stopping you from making 5 fake people, and one person can give another write access to folders on their OneDrive, so you could cobble together a scheme to use all 6 TB but there would be some hassle. I tried doing that once, having the fake person give the real me write access to a folder. I then uploaded a bunch of files to that shared folder from my regular account. Shortly afterward the fake person got disabled for TOS violations (but could be reenabled via a simple automated process). I'm not sure what the issue was, but what I uploaded was a bunch of Springer ebooks to from the large collection that Springer made freely downloadable early during COVID so that I could read them on my iPad. It could be that triggered some sort of anti-piracy measures. If you can find a way to make it work, though, 6 TB for $9.99/month or $99.year is a good deal even if you don't need the Office apps. [1] https://rclone.org/onedrive/ https://rclone.org/onedrive/
- rsync 5y agoStandard pricing is $25/TB/month. We have had a "HN reader discount" for many years ... just email and ask. If you're optimizing for price, I would suggest Backblaze.
- vlmutolo 5y agoWow, I'm not sure how I got the pricing so wrong. I remember visiting the rsync.net pricing page to check. I'd edit/delete my GP comment if I could. To be clear, is the $25/TB/month quoted with or without the HN discount?
- rsync 5y ago$25/TB/month is the headline price for "everybody". The HN discount price is lower than that (by a fair amount). The downsides to the discounted plans are as follows: - you can't have subaccounts/sublogins (child accounts). - we won't give you technical support for borg/attic/rclone integrations. We assume you are an expert. Of course you get normal run of the mill support ...
- trevyn 5y ago1fichier.com trends to €1/TB/month.
- crossroadsguy 5y agoThe website is not reachable. Maybe that’s why it costs that much? Or it’s not .com?
- trevyn 5y agoThe real site is https://1fichier.com https://1fichier.com , works for me and always has, check any blocking things you have? People use them for somewhat sketchy things, but they’re a legit if somewhat eccentric French company that’s been around for years (and is specifically supported by rclone: https://rclone.org/fichier/ https://rclone.org/fichier/). Sure, don’t put your critical data there without a backup, but at the price, it’s a nice option to have. There’s a .info that shows up in search results that I think is an otherwise unaffiliated reseller that they haven’t bothered to go after.