a. That isn't "simply" what Social Justice is. Not by a long shot, not in practice. b. It sounds like you are arguing for Equality based on merit, allowing eac

a. That isn't "simply" what Social Justice is. Not by a long shot, not in practice. b. It sounds like you are arguing for Equality based on merit, allowing each person a chance to thrive. I agree, that would be great. But what is actually happening is different: equity, where in practice most implementations stunt growth and paper over achievement gaps. c. I want a equal opportunity to thrive. But "social justice" is also extra-judicial justice. It sounds nice, but isn't waht I want. See also "motte and bailey".