6 ms·
they look pretty similar from the outside nanos is recently written for this particular use case and uses lwip for networking osv looks like FreeBSD with some
by convolvatron 5y ago
they look pretty similar from the outside
nanos is recently written for this particular use case and uses lwip for networking
osv looks like FreeBSD with some machinery around it to package single applications and run them on boot
- nix23 5y ago>osv looks like FreeBSD with some machinery around it to package single applications and run them on boot Just because ZFS? Because everything else is not from BSD's, it's a unikernel made to run on a hypervisor made to run linux-bin's, i really don't see a difference....or any plus to use nanos.
- dkjaudyeqooe 5y agoOSv describes the project as BSD code with a Linux compatibility layer. ZFS is optional.
- nix23 5y ago> OSv describes the project as BSD code with a Linux compatibility layer. Show me that. There is one little bsd folder that's it: https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv/tree/master/bsd https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv/tree/master/bsd Absolutely nothing written about BSD: https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv
- convolvatron 5y agoI was just looking at the source, there are big hunks of freebsd kernel in there, but I don't know the real functional decomposition. didn't suggest that nanos was better - if it does indeed use big hunks of freebsd code, that's had considerably more cooking time than nanos.