FYI the first cited research is to the work of the primary author of the CMF. Her work appears to be very ideologically-motivated, and her colleagues have raise

FYI the first cited research is to the work of the primary author of the CMF. Her work appears to be very ideologically-motivated, and her colleagues have raised serious questions about her research. She also routinely misrepresents the work of others. Based on what I have read [1, 2 of many], I no longer trust anything she says without checking the actual source. Based on coverage I've read, the CMF does not cite, acknowledge, or discuss any of the critiques of Boaler's work. If they had good responses to these critiques, they probably would have spent some of their 800 pages addressing these serious challenges. 1: http://www.danielwillingham.com/daniel-willingham-science-and-education-blog/march-13th-2019 http://www.danielwillingham.com/daniel-willingham-science-an... 2: https://gregashman.wordpress.com/2019/03/03/jo-boaler-cites-evidence-that-contradicts-her-claims-about-maths-facts-and-timed-tests/ https://gregashman.wordpress.com/2019/03/03/jo-boaler-cites-...