Where do you see that? The only portions relevant to this that I see in that blog post are consistent with free-to-post, remove-on-complaint: >When private in

Where do you see that? The only portions relevant to this that I see in that blog post are consistent with free-to-post, remove-on-complaint: >When private information or media has been shared on Twitter, we need a first-person report or a report from an authorized representative in order to make the determination that the image or video has been shared without their permission. This paragraph wouldn't even make sense if you had to provide proof on upload. Unless this is to say the uploaded proof was counterfeit or something? >When we are notified by individuals depicted, or by an authorized representative, that they did not consent to having their private image or video shared, we will remove it.