4 ms·
NSO has repeatedly shown that their statements are pretty much worthless. It's just damage control. I wouldn't put any stock in the "we avoid +1 numbers" to eve
by comrh 5y ago
NSO has repeatedly shown that their statements are pretty much worthless. It's just damage control. I wouldn't put any stock in the "we avoid +1 numbers" to even be real.
- bogwog 5y agoSeriously, they're pretty much the Mark Zuckerberg of their industry.
- indymike 5y agoThat is not fair to Mark Zuckerberg.
- rory 5y agoThey're pretty much the General Butt Naked of their industry.
- submeta 5y agoI‘d rather compare Zuckerberg to the Sackler family who knew how addictive and harmful their painkiller Oxycotin was, yet ignoring all evicence, making billions of dollars. Zuckerberg knows how bad Facebook and Instagram is, how harmful to individuals and society alike, yet ignoring that and making billions. Edit: Replaced „social media“ with „Facebook and Instagram“
- dylan604 5y agoWhy did you feel the need for the edit? I would agree with the blanket use of social media. Twitter is no better. Do we know enough about the inner working of TikTok to know they aren't doing similar?
- boomboomsubban 5y ago> I wouldn't put any stock in the "we avoid +1 numbers" to even be real. That part I believed. Setting up their software to not target the US seems like the kind of move they'd make. Claiming it's so they don't target innocent people is bullshit.