3 ms·
They have two different approaches to persistence, with different tradeoffs: https://redis.io/topics/persistence https://redis.io/topics/persistence Either wou
by tyingq 5y ago
They have two different approaches to persistence, with different tradeoffs: https://redis.io/topics/persistence https://redis.io/topics/persistence
Either would have the generic disadvantages of:
- Dataset can't exceed available memory
- The general disadvantages of NoSQL vs SQL around queries, transactions, etc, if you're expecting relational type functionality
- Raed667 5y ago> Dataset can't exceed available memory From my understanding, they do support sharding
- tyingq 5y agoSure, but still limited to the total amount of memory of all machines. You can't page in/out from storage.
- node-bayarea 5y agoYou can store Terabytes of data in Redis. Just google it.
- tyingq 5y agoYes, in Terabytes of RAM, or some separate commercial offering with flash. Not sure I get your point.
- sudo-it-all 5y agoRedis supports clustering and sharding: https://redis.io/topics/cluster-tutorial https://redis.io/topics/cluster-tutorial There are also managed solutions that implement Redis with partial flash storage. Redis Enterprise and AWS ElastiCache both do this.