>> For the purpose of this discussion "the goal" is clearly defined, but I'm afraid you missed it. Like how you apparently missed the other two bullets the art

>> For the purpose of this discussion "the goal" is clearly defined, but I'm afraid you missed it. Like how you apparently missed the other two bullets the article listed? Fair that your original comment was about speed, but, you're also dismissing the discussion after that (i.e., you had to notice various nuances to the problem that slowed you down, and that this optimization was something directly noticeable just in the example given in the problem discussion), as well as the comment (i.e., mine) that started this thread, that was about the quality of code being pulled from Github and informing Copilot, and NOT about the speed of coming up with a solution on your own under time pressure, which is unaffected in this instance when using Copilot. In short, you're saying "It's about speed; everything else doesn't matter", and I'm saying "It neither was about speed in my original post, nor is that the only possible goal". You're insisting the place you moved the goalposts is the only place they've ever existed.