Yeah. This article has the weird feeling of being some sort of hit piece on Page and/or Google. It seems to willfully ignore the successes coming out of Page's

Yeah. This article has the weird feeling of being some sort of hit piece on Page and/or Google. It seems to willfully ignore the successes coming out of Page's tenure (G+ being, if perhaps too early to call, very promising). And it overemphasizes factors largely attributable to market forces, or at least to forces not entirely within Page's direct control.