> No one has figured out what that really means. I didn't know either, so I googled it. It seems to basically be the idea that the distribution of tree cover i

> No one has figured out what that really means. I didn't know either, so I googled it. It seems to basically be the idea that the distribution of tree cover in urban areas shouldn't be as correlated with income distribution as it is. Seems pretty reasonable to me. There's a whole site about it here: https://www.americanforests.org/our-programs/tree-equity/ https://www.americanforests.org/our-programs/tree-equity/