2 ms·
>You are still arguing about this from the perspective of everything that it can't do No, I also told you what I think it would do. Create a corrupt local olig
by fauigerzigerk 5y ago
>You are still arguing about this from the perspective of everything that it can't do
No, I also told you what I think it would do. Create a corrupt local oligarchy that is extremely hard to disrupt. It would create a mediocre, low productivity, stagnant economy shaped by the most extreme form of protectionism I have ever heard of.
>Everything else can easily be worked around.
Your use of the word "easy" for something that would require a root and branch redesign of company law, tax law, employment law, competition law and scores of other laws in every country on earth tells me that you really haven't thought this through. Not to speak of changing the ownership structure of tens of thousands of existing companies.