I have a legal/human rights theory that I've been trying to promote, albeit with basically zero zeal. Crime is something that happens on the fringe of society

I have a legal/human rights theory that I've been trying to promote, albeit with basically zero zeal. Crime is something that happens on the fringe of society and as such should be a relatively small problem. If it happens enough even if it's technically illegal it ceases to be a real crime because so many people think it's OK. As such if something is to rise to the level of a crime we as a society ought to be willing to spend the resources to have a real human being make the accusation of crime. If you can't afford to put a human in the loop, it can't -- simply by definition -- be considered a crime. I'm sure there's a hole in my logic somewhere. There are likely big loopholes you could drive a bus through. But I can't help but feel that there's a nugget of truth in there somewhere. I don't think anyone should be able to be accused of something by a mere algorithm.