> they didn't invest enough in it. No, it was a good social network on paper, and they threw the whole company behind it. The issue was that it was meant to be

> they didn't invest enough in it. No, it was a good social network on paper, and they threw the whole company behind it. The issue was that it was meant to be a drop-in replacement for existing social networks. Except it didn't really solve any new customer issues, just solved the google issue of google not having a social space.