3 ms·
I would argue that this person is not a great hire for you then. If they cannot contribute to something you actually need, how could them bring awesome at somet
by int0x2e 5y ago
I would argue that this person is not a great hire for you then.
If they cannot contribute to something you actually need, how could them bring awesome at something else help?
Imagine a different situation - there's a fellow engineer who's also an olympic gold medalist in some sport. They may be awesome to have around. They may have cool stories. They may have connections. But unless they can harness that towards sometging that helps your mission - it really won't make them any better as an engineer.
- pjmlp 5y agoI have been there, I have been part of teams that were created to do X, when it wasn't really required, just some architects thought so. So when everything is in place, from management point of view it is easier to charge ahead than acknowledge it was a bad decision. In the end when everything falls appart, they will either no longer be there, or find other reasons why it failed.