3 ms·
Sure, but if wages for juniors were more like ~40k instead of 100k+, and there was a steep upward wage growth from junior to midlevel to senior, you don't think
by actually_a_dog 5y ago
Sure, but if wages for juniors were more like ~40k instead of 100k+, and there was a steep upward wage growth from junior to midlevel to senior, you don't think that would change the candidate pool?