> then that's on them for attacking, not on us for responding. and if the other party applies this same reasoning to your response? if your epistemics are at a

> then that's on them for attacking, not on us for responding. and if the other party applies this same reasoning to your response? if your epistemics are at all self-consistent, then after the escalation you’re responsible for the negative impact on about half of all the lives impacted. the easy out you present is just self delusion.