4 ms·
But the f'd up part is the property-destroying riots, not the citizens trying to protect the community. Take away the 2nd, there'd be more damage. Take away t
by kbelder 5y ago
But the f'd up part is the property-destroying riots, not the citizens trying to protect the community. Take away the 2nd, there'd be more damage. Take away the 1st, everything would be fine.
- Nursie 5y ago> But the f'd up part is the property-destroying riots, not the citizens trying to protect the community. I disagree. It's all a huge mess. Armed citizens setting themselves up as effective vigilante defence forces is terrible both for the circumstances that lead there, and the action itself. It really looks like a broken society, and is something I'd expect in far less developed countries. > Take away the 2nd, there'd be more damage Maybe, but maybe there would be more people alive.