4 ms·
> and it actually makes high-performance implementations (wide superscalar) more difficult thanks to the variable width decoding. More difficult than x86? We'r
by audunw 5y ago
> and it actually makes high-performance implementations (wide superscalar) more difficult thanks to the variable width decoding.
More difficult than x86? We're talking about a damn simple variable width decoding here.
I could imagine RISC-V with C extension being more tricky than 64-bit ARM. Maybe.
> and again it complicates a high performance implementation.
But so much of the rationale behind the design of RISC-V is to simplify high performance implementation in other ways. So the big question is what the net effect is.
The other big question is if extensions will be added to optimise for desktop/server workloads by the time RISC-V CPUs penetrate that market significantly.