3 ms·
A sweet spot, were the elderly first were not properly protected, and then euthanized instead of given at least a treatment effort? Not even C-Pap, just panic-r
by PicassoCTs 5y ago
A sweet spot, were the elderly first were not properly protected, and then euthanized instead of given at least a treatment effort? Not even C-Pap, just panic-relieve and pain-medication. Not even given a choice, just scratched out of the book by politics.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2841CG https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2841CG
It was a reckless betrayal of the elderly population of sweden.
I'm all for the freedom of self-euthanization, if a person longs for that and no, this can not be compared with what went down.
Which can be best described as a remnant from a horrific pre-worldwar 2 "survival of the fittest" mindset being dragged into the light.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]