4 ms·

http://www.diginotar.nl/Actueel/tabid/264/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/327/Default.aspx http://www.diginotar.nl/Actueel/tabid/264/articleType/Articl... ht

http://www.diginotar.nl/Actueel/tabid/264/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/327/Default.aspx http://www.diginotar.nl/Actueel/tabid/264/articleType/Articl... http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.diginotar.nl/Actueel/tabid/264/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/327/Default.aspx http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&... Incompetence doesn't begin to describe this statement. They say: Your browser might throw some warnings when communicating with government services. In 99.9% of the cases this is a false alarm and you can safely ignore it. By own accord 1 in a 1000 (of 9 million users) can get MitM'ed and yet you teach people that it is safe to ignore it... They appear to use the same audit company from last time. The Consumentbond already tells people to expect warnings and ignore them, for they have not been hacked, but merely experience a temporary "browser issue". Reports of DigiD helpdesk telling people to ignore warnings, lower security settings or place the site in "trusted sites".

tripzilch 15y ago
> The Consumentbond already tells people to expect warnings and ignore them, for they have not been hacked, but merely experience a temporary "browser issue". Reports of DigiD helpdesk telling people to ignore warnings, lower security settings or place the site in "trusted sites". Isn't that because Mozilla also blocked certs used by the Dutch gov (which DigiD uses I suppose), which aren't actually compromised? I read that in a new update they'll unblock the Dutch gov certs though. Still never a good idea to teach people to ignore warnings, especially not on a site like DigiD.