4 ms·
Trigger of rare blood clots with AstraZeneca jab found by scientists
- ErrantX 5y agoI feel like the title of this article comes across as Anti-vax but it is genuinely interesting. Amongst all the FUD a group of scientists say down figured out the problem. I love science. Awesome stuff.
- loudtieblahblah 5y ago>I feel like the title of this article comes across as Anti-vax That's because people have been trained that anything even slightly contrary to the 'agenda' (regardless of how positive or nefarious you find it to be) is inherently "antivax". It's been successfully framed with the same culture-war argumentative trappings as "white supremacy" to the point you can't have a conversation about it, in most spheres. There's people who parrot the official talking points and then there's everyone else. Even a robust, scientific position that may have some questions in the details gets painted with the same broad brushes as an Alex Jones types who think the vax is microchipping everyone.
- vaxman2 5y agoCause this was immediately flagged I'll post here. Pfizer's own adverse reaction data: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarke...
- vaxman2 5y ago[flagged]
- jasonpeacock 5y ago[flagged]
- badabingthr 5y agoPerhaps true in the north american colonies but in proper english it is a perfectly fine term referring to an injection.
- jasonpeacock 5y agoTIL, thanks!
- TechBro8615 5y agoNo, “jab” is en_GB equivalent of “shot” in en_US. It does sound silly, but not as silly as citing its usage as evidence that the BBC is pushing an anti-vax agenda.
- jasonpeacock 5y agoTIL, thanks!
- kowalej 5y ago[dead]