> either Your argument vastly underestimates size of the Space and the amount of goods in it. I firmly believe that the third option will take place: "no one

> either Your argument vastly underestimates size of the Space and the amount of goods in it. I firmly believe that the third option will take place: "no one needs to bother". Why bother destroying some little tiny pale blue dot, if your sky is literally filled with them and you can't even count them? We're so focused and enclosed our minds on our precious Earth, that we laughably think is so big and valuable.