3 ms·
While you're not wrong about Russia, similar things can be said about the US and its allies (of which my own country is one). True, the US typically attacks co
by simiones 5y ago
While you're not wrong about Russia, similar things can be said about the US and its allies (of which my own country is one).
True, the US typically attacks countries that are farther away, but their devastation of Irak and Afghanistan is much worse than Ukraine or Georgia (another victim of Russian aggression) have suffered in the last 20 years at least. And while Iraq and Afghanistan were by no means democratic regimes, we can see plenty of democratic governments toppled by American power and their allies - In Yemen in 2014 (mostly Saudi led, but with US arms and support), Haiti in 2004, Nicaragua and El Salvador in the late 1970s, Iran in 1953. There are also many other despotic regimes that the US successfully helped against revolutions that may have toppled them (most memorably, in South Vietnam, but also at various times in Iraq and much of South America).
Empires are always evil, and they are always seeking to spread their propaganda. The only way of getting a slightly clearer picture is to use sources from multiple such empires and try to build a more accurate picture than any one of them wants you to.
So yes, please use both Yandex and Google for search, read RT as well as the New York Times, Al Jazeera, AFP, etc.
- b112 5y agoWhat a borked view of the world. Yes, the US invades places. Yet the damage in Afghanistan and Iraq, is caused far more by their own people, killing and slaughtering each other over religious grounds.
- simiones 5y ago> Yet the damage in Afghanistan and Iraq, is caused far more by their own people, killing and slaughtering each other over religious grounds. We, the USA and its allies, have directly killed thousands to tens of thousands of Iraqi and Afghan civilians, and many more "enemy combatants" (it's important to remember that under the rules of the "War on Terror", any adult male is counted as an enemy combatant by default, unless explicitly proven otherwise). The Russians killed as many or more during the Soviet invasion. The opposition forces are also responsible for a great many civilian deaths (many more than the US led forces, at least in Iraq, according to official numbers). But this is what happens when you invade a country, especially one already divided along sectarian lines: the people who rise up against you start seeing enemies and collaborators everywhere and killing their own as well. Were there sectarian killings in Iraq and Afghanistan before the war? Absolutely, but a mere fraction of what happened during the war.
- lovelyviking 5y ago>While you're not wrong about Russia, similar things can be said about the US and its allies (of which my own country is one). There is nothing comparable between Russia and US and it's allies because Russia is not democratic country and as such values and intentions are completely different. >So yes, please use both Yandex and Google for search, read RT as well as the New York Times, Al Jazeera, AFP, etc. I am sorry but you cannot recommend deliberate lies machines as the source of information. I mean you can but the value of RT as source of information is zero if one has brain and knows how RT works. For the source of information one should check the source and how it is reliable. If it's not then it is not the source of information.