3 ms·
+1 on `earthly ls`. I've also thought it would be valuable to have "public" and "private" targets. When looking at a new codebase it can be hard to know which t
by jazzdan 5y ago
+1 on `earthly ls`. I've also thought it would be valuable to have "public" and "private" targets. When looking at a new codebase it can be hard to know which targets I should use when developing, and which are purely for internal use. Good docs help with this too, but they are not always there.
- vladaionescu 5y agoPublic / Private is interesting. Private would not be callable from command line and not be listed in `earthly ls`?
- jazzdan 5y agoYeah, exactly. Or even just not listed in `earthly ls`, maybe you'd still want to be able to call them manually for debugging purposes.
- adamgordonbell 5y agoWe have a PR for the ls feature up: https://github.com/earthly/earthly/pull/1472 https://github.com/earthly/earthly/pull/1472