7 ms·
I really like Snowden's recommended Faraday cage for phones or other devices of similar size: two drink-shaker cups[1]. Drink shakers are cheap and widely avai
by pdkl95 5y ago
I really like Snowden's recommended Faraday cage for phones or other devices of similar size: two drink-shaker cups[1].
Drink shakers are cheap and widely available. The average hotel room in any medium/large hotel chain probably includes a shaker as a standard item as part of the minibar. The simple two-cup style (as seen in [1]) is preferred over the fancier "strainer top" style because you can press the two cups together; this should cause the inner cup to slightly cut into and/or deform the outer cup along the circle where they join together. The seal between the cups should work sort of like the knife-edge seals used in vacuum chambers.
A metal box or conductive bag is only a Faraday cage if it is fully closed/sealed. Any imperfection in the seal or hole[2] might allow the radio signal to leak out. Most improvised items (freezer, random metal box, etc) have poor seals. Making a high quality cage that actually block a modern phone can be done without much trouble, but the drink shaker method is the only method I know of that will do the job using widely available (free) or very cheap ($10-ish?) parts.
[1] https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HLB1yRyhXZTxK1Rjy0Fgq6yovpXaZ/Wine-Cocktail-Shaker-Set-Mixing-Making-Drinking-Container-Barware-Bartender-Drink-Party-Bar-Tools-Stainless-Steel.jpg_Q90.jpg https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HLB1yRyhXZTxK1Rjy0Fgq6yovpXaZ/Win...
[2] Holes of sufficient size. How big are the waves you are trying to block?
- MR4D 5y agoNow would be a great time to sell a ton of mints that just happens to fit an iPhone max with a case inside. “Security Mints - sweet & secure”. Maybe a kickstarter?
- ncmncm 5y agoIt is hard to believe this would perform better than a Lazzaroni tin. And I don't recall ever finding one of these things in a hotel room, even in Europe.
- ejolto 5y agoDepends what the tin and shaker are made of. The tin is probably made of aluminum which has a higher skin depth than stainless steel, which I assume the shaker cups are made of. A Faraday cage of continuous surface needs walls that are thicker than the skin depth of the material the cage is made of. Since the skin depth of stainless steel is lower, the cage wall thickness can be lower while still creating an effective Faraday cage compared to an aluminum cage. Ref skin depth of different materials at different EM frequencies:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Skin_depth_by_Zureks.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Skin_dep...
- amluto 5y agoThe tin is painted, and paint is nonconductive. A very thin long slit in an otherwise conductive surface or mesh can be extremely leaky.
- yosito 5y agoReminds me of a joke my dad used to tell: Dad: What's five plus five? yosito: Ten! D: How many fingers do you have? y: Ten! D: What's an aluminum can made out of? y: Tin! D: Wrong! Aluminum!
- geewee 5y agoI'm from Europe and I've never seen one either.
- ghaff 5y agoI imagine I've seen them now and then but they're hardly common. I'm grateful when I get real glassware.
- causi 5y agoWhat's the physics behind being able to make a container light-tight with a couple of right angle corners yet radio waves seem to leak out like water?
- hammock 5y agoA couple of right angles not really make it light tight either. I remember going caving and we would have to go 100m or more through many different turns before we all turned our lamps off and truly experienced perfect dark.
- newaccount74 5y agoThere's an old man made cave near me that consists of two small connected chambers, and once you are in the second chamber it is pitch black.
- devb 5y agoAre you familiar with daylight tanks for film processing? They work as advertised using right angles.
- pdkl95 5y agoThe last time I used a daylight tank was in the mid '90s so maybe newer models are different, but I believe they are made out of black/dark plastic? Several right angle turns of black plastic provides multiple opportunities for a visible-light photon to be absorbed into a black body where it should be re-radiated as infrared (heat). A hole/leak in the metal wall of a Faraday cage is going to be a lot more reflective and can easily act like a crude waveguide[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waveguide_%28radio_frequency%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waveguide_%28radio_frequency%2...
- 2rsf 5y agoRadio waves (well, light and radio are the same thing just with different wavelength) are bounced from conductive materials, light is absorbed
- adolph 5y ago> The average hotel room in any medium/large hotel chain probably includes a shaker as a standard item as part of the minibar. Maybe the hotels you stay in, Bond, James Bond.
- pdkl95 5y agoI admit the vast majority of my experience with hotels consists of a single repeated data point: the staff[1] suite(s) we shared in the Hilton attached to the SJ convention center. They always had glasses/shaker/etc. You could probably ask for a shaker from roomservice or the hotel bar, if necessary. [1] If you registered for FanimeCon 2000-2011, the weird software you had to use was my fault...
- speedgoose 5y agoHilton is a tiny bit more fancy than the average.
- adolph 5y agoShe's not an average ship, Jim!
- GordonS 5y ago> The average hotel room in any medium/large hotel chain probably includes a shaker as a standard item as part of the minibar I've stayed in dozens of hotels all over the world, and never once have I seen a cocktail shaker in the minibar?!
- ghshephard 5y agoI've stayed in over a hundred, frequently in suites (upgrades), often at 4* hotels, in 22 countries (Full set of brands - Marriot, Hyatt, JW, etc...) Ice Buckets are pretty common - but I have never once seen a drink shaker in a room mini-bar.
- srcreigh 5y agoThe Fairmont Royal York in Toronto has shaker cups. It is 5-star though.
- 14 5y agoI think the issue is then you have to wait until you are already inside the hotel to use those shakers, which as others have said don’t actually exist in most hotels, and at that point you have been tracked to your exact location. Then it would be trivial to surveil you with other methods without needing your phone.
- JacobThreeThree 5y agoPretty sure Google uses dead reckoning geolocation tracking when no signal is available. So as long as your phone is outside of the bag at some point, you're being tracked even when the phone is in the bag, and Google can correct any errors in their dead reckoning calculations once a signal is found.
- BenjiWiebe 5y agoIt's possible, but I'd be surprised. Dead reckoning is terribly inaccurate. To get briefly acceptable accuracy, you need extremely precise sensors that you are reading very very quickly (which would make battery life plummet).
- sumtechguy 5y agoAt one company I worked at we had an 'out of coverage bucket'. It was a zinc plated steel bucket. Worked almost every time. Some dude had found at an arts and craft store a very small version of the same thing. It fit over phones perfectly. Basically put device on ground. Put bucket over it. If you had any gaps or any cables hanging out it was sort of iffy and you would get coverage sometimes.
- kurthr 5y agoIf you're interested in simple cages similar in effectiveness to the EDEC Window Pouch (they drop off above 3GHz)... try a Microwave Oven. They are highly available, reasonably convenient and well designed, with pretty good quality control. You can even still see your phone inside has zero bars. I do, however, recommend unplugging the microwave (or even cutting the power cord) as a fire would likely result from cooking your hardware. To answer [2] How big are the waves you're trying to block? - it's actually crack length not width that usually determines the effective re-radiating antenna length. They can be very narrow, but a long (a few cm) crack will allow one polarization through almost completely. I've run this test with a GSM base station and confirmed the effectiveness. If you want to test communication with a device to a base station, but have many other local antennas interfering and want to fit many devices inside... it's a decent choice. The alternatives are less convenient and usually thousands of dollars to construct.
- Johnythree 5y agoThe door seals in most microwave ovens consist of tuned slots (eg half-wave stubs) to prevent the RF escaping. These are ineffective at frequencies other than 2.4Ghz. The reason for the tuned slots is that it's basically impossible to make a conventional metal joint which will seal sufficiently well.
- kurthr 5y agoI encourage you to test a few. I found that the cheap ones blocked 2.45GHz ~60dB, but that they were still down 40dB at 600MHz... the real problems were at higher frequencies and 5GHz was only down ~20-30dB at the worst case polarization. I tried using RF absorbing tape, but while it's possible to improve another 10-20dB it's painful and not repeatable without testing, if you need to remove it. I've also worked in RF Antenna test rooms with seals that are expensive, finicky, and easy to damage... they're also at least $10k and usually much much more. In a corporate environment that's not a problem, but for a home lab it's unrealistic. If these bags were big enough to put a few phones and a small base antenna in they'd have other uses.