4 ms·
Not really? The original title is careful to say "citing court order", not "per court order" etc. If anything, I think your title is more editorialized, since
by dustintrex 5y ago
Not really? The original title is careful to say "citing court order", not "per court order" etc.
If anything, I think your title is more editorialized, since Google is clearly doing this for legal reasons, not exactly "voluntarily".
- nosianu 5y ago"citing court order" to me as a non-legal person indicates that it is one they received. I hope you don't expect this non-legal forum's headlines to be parsed like legal text? How does "citing" indicate it is not an order Google received? I merely gave my opinion as a non-legal casual news reader. To me at lest this new headline conveyed what happened more clearly before I delved into the article.
- notreallyserio 5y ago"citing a court order against ISPs" would be sufficient, I think.
- southerntofu 5y agoAs a non-native speaker, the difference between "citing" and "per" would have me confused. The HN title is much more explicit.