> Using a `std::vector<std::byte>` And herein lies the problem. Your statement is correct. But that type definition is exactly why C++ feels like a 50's car re

> Using a `std::vector<std::byte>` And herein lies the problem. Your statement is correct. But that type definition is exactly why C++ feels like a 50's car retrofitted with an electric drivetrain and a DVD player on the dash It will almost run like a modern thing but it will fail when it shouldn't.