4 ms·
Not really, AI is more of a large collection of activities. I would distill it down to "problem-solving". The irony is that once you solve a problem, it's not
by bo1024 5y ago
Not really, AI is more of a large collection of activities. I would distill it down to "problem-solving".
The irony is that once you solve a problem, it's not a problem, so people's natural reaction is to only call things AI when they're unsolved. Once it's solved, "that's not AI".
- visarga 5y agoAbility to solve novel problems with little experience. Skill acquisition efficiency. On the Measure of Intelligence, François Chollet https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547
- bo1024 5y agoThat's not really compatible with the history of AI, where designing systems to solve a problem has traditionally been considered in scope. Seems that, like many people, Chollet wants to think of AI in terms of AGI (artificial general intelligence).
- visarga 5y agoYes, that's what he focuses on. General intelligence, not narrow task-related intelligence. If a system uses too much experience (training samples) to learn a task then it's not intelligent. It just brute forces the problem. Intelligence requires quick learning from very little experience.