> business The logistics of setting up as many shell companies and domains which are squatted seems unreasonable. The onus is on the purchaser not to illegall

> business The logistics of setting up as many shell companies and domains which are squatted seems unreasonable. The onus is on the purchaser not to illegally purchase a domain against the licence agreement or the domain is revoked. Both of these would likely massively reduce the financial incentives domain squatters enjoy. > personal They can still licence a domain, but when they're done with it, it returns to the pool of available domains for others to purchase. > Websites sure, and websites are the major driving force behind domain squatting though. Maybe I'm explaining this poorly, and I know I haven't solved the worlds problems in a single post but it's fun to theorise, however if I purchase a software licence, I cannot sell that on. If a business purchases a software licence and that business changes ownership, the licence isn't always void.