The Rittenhouse shootings were in Wisconsin, not Michigan. The jury instructions[1] have no law like what you're describing. The self-defense standard explaine

The Rittenhouse shootings were in Wisconsin, not Michigan. The jury instructions[1] have no law like what you're describing. The self-defense standard explained by the judge is simply that the defendant must believe that the level of force used was necessary to terminate an imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm, and the defendant's belief must be reasonable. However, "a person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack, and who does provoke an attack, is not allowed to use.. self-defense against that attack." The judge ruled that it was legal for him to be carrying a gun that night, so while carrying a gun might provoke others, it's not unlawful conduct that provokes others. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/11/17/us/rittenhouse-trial-jury-instructions.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/11/17/us/rittenhous...